A Lost chance for peace

A Lost chance for peace
August 2000

 

During most of July-August 2000, the strategic scenario in South Asia remained dominated by the developments in Kashmir. In the background of a demand for autonomy from the state legislature, release of leaders belonging to the militant outfit Hizbul Mujahideen and subsequent unilateral declaration of cease fire by the group, the table was set for open and unconditional dialogue amidst hope that the other groups would soon realise the futility of an armed struggle and come forward to participate in the peace process. (The Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister, Dr. Farooq Abdullah, The Hindu 1 August 2000). There were welcoming reactions from a large cross section of public opinion both internal and external. Even the organisation of Kashmiri Pundits, Panun Kashmir expected the community’s involvement in the proposed dialogue with militants as its participation to ascertain their views, as they were “part and parcel of the Valley, despite living in forced exile for the last 10 years”. (PTI: The Times of India 1 August 2000) Khawaja Mushtaq Hussain, president of Jammu and Kashmir National Liberation Front, Europe Zone, hailing Hizbul Mujahideen’s unilateral cease-fire decision, urged for an unconditional dialogue with the representatives of all regions of the State.”People of Kashmir are sick and tired of violence and guns” and want an honorable lasting peace” (PTI: The Hindustan Times 4 August 2000)

There were oppositions nonetheless obviously from vested interests that have been thriving with the continuation of the conflict. Across the border of contention in the Pakistan occupied Kashmir, the Harkatul Mujahideen vowed to pursue its separatist battle in Kashmir, saying only ‘jihad’ (holy war) and not a cease-fire or dialogue could resolve the conflict. “We have decided on oath that we will never betray the blood of martyrs nor would allow anyone else to do so,” (Harkat chief Maulana Farooq Kashmiri at a rally in a village of Bagh district in Pakistan-administered Kashmir; IANS: The Times of India 1 August 2000.) Even in the ranks of the Hizbul Mujahideen on both sides of the border, there were ample signs of disagreement. Almost all political and religious organisations in Pakistan, surprised at Hizbul’s unilateral cease-fire, decided not to support the separatist group even as its chief Syed Salahuddin sought to explain away the reasons behind the sudden cessation of hostilities. Most groups opposed to the cease-fire argued that the move would not help in finding a solution to the long-standing Kashmir problem. (Muhammad Najeeb: The Asian Age 2 August 2000). Even the All Parties Hurriyat Conference leaders were not optimistic about the outcome of the talks. “These talks will not restore peace (aman) in the state,” APHC chairman Abdul Gani Bhat told The Times of India News Service demanding the association of Pakistan and the APHC in these talks. (The Times of India 5 August 2000). Many in the Hurriyat felt that the Hizbul’s decision to call a cease-fire had undermined their own relevance and deflated their own dialogue with the Center. Panthers Party President Bhim Singh was critical of the talks with the Hizbul Mujahideen alone and said that “Talks are meaningless” and “would be a failure” until leaders of the Hurriyat Conference, which represents all militant outfits operating in the Valley are also involved. He further maintained that the Center should have taken the leaders of Jammu and even Ladhakh into confidence before holding talks with anyone in the State. (The Hindustan Times 6 August 2000)

The least of the surprises however, was the Pakistan’s expectation to be a part of the dialogue (IANS: The Times of India 2 August 2000) which India promptly rejected. New Delhi did not find any place for Pakistan or any other ‘foreign elements’ in the talks to be conducted within the framework of the constitution. India made it clear that it will not let Pakistan enter the dialogue process through the backdoor. (K.K. Katyal The Hindu 4 August 2000)
The talks, finally held on 4 August 2000 was preceded by a spate of terrorist attacks against innocent civilians meant to create a condition of hatred sufficient to derail the process. A series of massacres by militants across Jammu and Kashmir left 91 people, including 26 laborers and eight members of a village defense committee, dead and injured several others. 32 persons succumbed to the shootout at the Pahalgam camp for Amaranth pilgrims. Within five hours of the Pahalgam massacre, a group of militants descended on Katran village in Qazigund area of south Kashmir and massacred 19 laborers. (The Hindu 3 August 2000) The massacres were universally condemned as attempts by Pakistan based terrorist groups to sabotage the talks. “The path we are following is one of peace and we will not leave it. Whatever difficulties we encounter, we will face. A message should go from this House that we will not be cowed down by terrorism,” declared the Indian Prime Minister in the Lok Sabha. (The Hindustan Times 3 August 2000) Union home minister L.K. Advani saw in the latest outburst of violence in the valley a determined bid by those upset at the prospects of peace to abort the initiative taken by the Hizbul Mujahideen last week and indicated Pakistan-backed terrorist group Lashkar-e-Tayyaba to be behind the massacres. (The Asian Age 3 August 2000.) The establishment, shaken by the worst-ever killings in the decade-long militancy, nevertheless demonstrated a firm inclination to stick to the path of “peace” and persevere in the strategy of negotiation. Though the scale of the killings left almost everyone stunned, it was not entirely unexpected and Hizbul leader, Majid Dar was prompt to convey to the Indian interlocutors his condemnation of the unprecedented violence. (Harish Khare The Hindu 3 August 2000.) Behind the mayhem was the unmistakable hand of Pakistan as aptly pointed out by the Indian Prime Minister that every time India had taken an initiative for peace Pakistan had responded by inciting brutal terrorist acts. The obvious reference was to the Kargil fiasco following India’s bold effort to achieve peace and normalisation of relations with Pakistan through ‘bus diplomacy’. The international community saw through the evil designs and the President Clinton led the world to convey the ‘concern’, appreciated India’s “positive response”, and offered to talk to Pakistan and “to do everything possible to contain such activities”. (The Times of India 3 August 2000.) Even A prominent Kashmiri separatist leader and founding father of Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) Hashim Qureshi slammed Pakistan for the brutal massacre of innocent people in the state and said these so-called ‘friends of Kashmiris cannot be followers of Islam’. Appealing to the international community to ask Pakistan to shut down the offices of terrorist organisations, Qureshi said, “They will never allow a peaceful solution to the Kashmir problem and Kashmiris will continue to suffer the untold miseries for no fault of theirs.”(PTI: The Times of India 5 August 2000)
The first round of talks between the Hizbul Mujahideen and the Indian Government ended with a positive after note, both sides agreeing to go ahead with the process and nominated two committees for the purpose. Direct talks were held between the Union Home Secretary, Mr. Kamal Pandey, assisted by special secretaries in the Ministry and four Hizbul commanders – Mr. Riyaz Rasool, Mr. Masood, Mr. Farooq Riyaz and Mr. Zaffar in the presence of Hizbul-nominated mediator, Mr. Fazal-haq-Qureshi, the chief of People’s Political Front. India’s determination to build on the cease-fire offer and attempt for dialogue received general acclamation. “We are encouraged by the determination of the government to build on the cease-fire offer and the moves to address the concerns of people in Jammu and Kashmir.” ( US ambassador to India The Times of India 5 August2000)
The cracks in the ranks of The Hizbul Mujahideen however, caught up with its leaders. In an apparent about turn Hizbul chief, Syed Salahuddin made a demand for tripartite talks outside the framework of the Indian Constitution involving Pakistan and set a deadline for the Indian Government to respond at the threat of a reconsideration of its cease-fire declaration. (B Muralidhar Reddy: The Hindu 4 August 2000) This demand put a question mark on the future of the Hizb-Centre talks on chalking out the modalities for a cease-fire monitoring mechanism. Resistance to keep Pakistan away continued with Jammu and Kashmir Awami League, political wing of counter-insurgents, cautioning the Center against “falling into the trap”. “The government should beware from falling into a trap by accepting the condition of Hizbul supreme commander Syed Salahuddin for involving Pakistan in talks,” (Capt S K Tickoo, general secretary: The Times of India 5 August 2000) Dr. Abdullah, the Chief Minister of JK while foreseeing a role for Hizbul Mujahideen in the state politics, ruled out tripartite talks involving Pakistan. “Government of India is not going to talk to Pakistan unless cross border terrorism is stopped. (PTI:The Hindu 8 August 2000)
Pakistan reaffirmed its resolve for tripartite talks involving India, Pakistan and the All-Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC), as logical and in accordance with international law and principles. “According to the United Nations Security Council resolutions, Pakistan and India are the two major parties to Kashmir conflict and Kashmiri should also be included in the talks. (The Hindu 6 August 2000) With the Indian Government standing firm on exclusion of Pakistan and expecting the Hizbul Mujahideen leadership to withdraw the August 8 deadline set by Syed Salahuddin second round failed to take off. (PTI: The Hindu 6 August 2000) The curtain finally came down with announcement of withdrawal of offer of cease-fire and resumption of fighting in Kashmir by Hizbul Mujahideen on the plea that India has failed to respond to its demand for a tripartite dialogue outside the ambit of the Constitution, the Hizbul chief, Syed Salahuddin, taking the extraordinary step of explaining to world diplomats how India “failed to give peace a chance.” ( The Hindu 8 August 2000) Salahuddin blamed India having failed to reciprocate its gesture and demonstrating “traditional intransigence”. Conditions for “review and reconsider” its decision were announced- India must prepare itself to “break the barrier of rigidity – tripartite talks involving India, Pakistan and Kashmiris or implementation of the United Nations Security Council resolution for a plebiscite to determine the will of the people of Kashmir.

A wave of disappointment swept across the valley raising fears for increased violence in the days ahead. “We had a chance to restore peace in the blood-soaked valley and we lost it,” said Shabir Ahmad Shah, a senior separatist leader. (The Indian Express 9 August 2000) The Hurriyat leaders as also Pakistan-based militant organisations engaged in fighting in Kashmir rejoiced at the Hizbul’s decision to call off the cease-fire as a vindication of their stand. “We had said and reiterated that the Hizbul’s decision lacked vision and this decision was hasty. The boys (militants) had not consulted other groups fighting in Kashmir. Any decision relating to cease-fire has to be collective and not an isolated one.” (Tariq Bhat: The Indian Express 9 August2000)
Regretting the decision of the Hizbul Mujahideen The US urged all parties to “nurture and continue a process of peace in Kashmir… We welcomed the initiation of the discussion between India and the Hizbul Mujahideen and we encourage the resumption.” Washington however was guarded in its opinion on nature of participation. “The decision on how the talks are structured need to be made by the parties involved,” (The Hindu 9 August 2000) New Delhi held “Pakistani agencies” responsible for putting “intense pressure on the Hizbul Mujahideen leadership in the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir to revoke the cease-fire.” At the same time, the Government reiterated its firm commitment to the “peace process” and called upon “on all those have taken to arms to return to the path of peace.” (The Hindu 9 August 2000)
As peace lay buried under the games of one up-manship and the region is threatened with violence of the deadlier kind (“India will have to pay heavily for its refusal to have tripartite talks on Kashmir…The Hizbul during the next few days will undertake bombings on a scale that has never been witnessed during the past ten years of the liberation struggle.”), it is pure optimism that keeps the hope aloft. The Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister, Dr. Farooq Abdullah, believes that the withdrawal of cease-fire by the Hizbul Mujahideen is not the end of the game and is confident that some groups will come for talks. Pakistan says it is ready to a join a “purposeful dialogue” with India for a peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute. Government will not swerve from chosen path, says Advani, refraining from operations, which could impede the possible revival of the peace dialogue with the militants. Meanwhile scores will continue to die and the valley will remain to be one of discord and disharmony spewing out its venom that will affect the security and long term prosperity in the sub-continent.

Compiled by

Arabinda Acharya

35 thoughts on “A Lost chance for peace

  • May 24, 2017 at 8:29 am
    Permalink

    I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles
    or blog posts on this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website.

    Reading this info So i am happy to express that I’ve an incredibly just right
    uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed.
    I most for sure will make certain to don?t omit this website and
    provides it a glance on a relentless basis.

  • May 24, 2017 at 10:19 am
    Permalink

    I blog frequently and I really thank you for your content.
    The article has truly peaked my interest. I am going
    to take a note of your blog and keep checking for new
    information about once per week. I opted in for your Feed too.

  • May 24, 2017 at 10:52 am
    Permalink

    Hello, i think that i saw you visited my website thus i came to “return the favor”.I am trying to find things
    to improve my web site!I suppose its ok to use a
    few of your ideas!!

  • May 24, 2017 at 11:23 am
    Permalink

    Neat blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine.

    Please let me know where you got your design. Appreciate it

  • May 25, 2017 at 7:12 am
    Permalink

    As the admin of this site is working, no uncertainty very shortly it will be well-known, due to its feature contents.

  • May 25, 2017 at 2:19 pm
    Permalink

    Link exchange is nothing else except it is simply placing
    the other person’s weblog link on your page at proper place and other person will also
    do same in favor of you.

  • May 25, 2017 at 2:28 pm
    Permalink

    Hello, i feel that i saw you visited my web site
    thus i got here to go back the favor?.I’m trying to to find things to improve my website!I
    suppose its adequate to make use of some of your ideas!!

  • May 25, 2017 at 5:09 pm
    Permalink

    I do not know if it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else
    encountering issues with your website. It appears as if some of the text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment
    and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
    This may be a problem with my browser because I’ve had this happen before.
    Thank you

  • May 25, 2017 at 5:23 pm
    Permalink

    Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much
    about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a little
    bit, but instead of that, this is fantastic blog. A
    great read. I’ll certainly be back.

  • May 25, 2017 at 5:36 pm
    Permalink

    You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this
    topic to be really something that I think I would never understand.

    It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  • May 25, 2017 at 6:09 pm
    Permalink

    Hello to every one, because I am really keen of reading this webpage’s post to be updated regularly.
    It includes pleasant information.

  • May 26, 2017 at 8:10 am
    Permalink

    I’m gone to say to my little brother, that he should also pay a
    visit this website on regular basis to take updated from
    latest information.

  • May 26, 2017 at 10:35 am
    Permalink

    Wow, fantastic weblog structure! How long have you
    ever been blogging for? you make blogging glance easy.
    The overall look of your website is wonderful, let alone the content material!

  • June 7, 2017 at 12:38 pm
    Permalink

    The other day, while I was at work, my cousin stole my
    iPad and tested to see if it can survive a 30 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.

    I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  • June 7, 2017 at 2:44 pm
    Permalink

    Hey there! I’ve been following your web site for a long time now and
    finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from
    Humble Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the good job!

  • June 7, 2017 at 2:50 pm
    Permalink

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate
    to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS
    feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this
    blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  • June 7, 2017 at 4:41 pm
    Permalink

    Everything is very open with a really clear clarification of
    the challenges. It was definitely informative. Your site is extremely helpful.
    Thank you for sharing!

  • June 7, 2017 at 4:48 pm
    Permalink

    I was recommended this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this submit is written through
    him as no one else realize such detailed approximately my trouble.

    You are amazing! Thank you!

  • June 7, 2017 at 5:47 pm
    Permalink

    I like the valuable info you supply on your articles.
    I will bookmark your weblog and check again right
    here frequently. I am moderately sure I’ll learn a lot of new stuff proper
    here! Best of luck for the next!

  • June 7, 2017 at 8:33 pm
    Permalink

    Hi, yes this paragraph is in fact nice and I have learned lot of things from
    it about blogging. thanks.

  • June 7, 2017 at 9:41 pm
    Permalink

    Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve visited this web site before but after browsing
    through some of the articles I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyways, I’m certainly delighted I discovered it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!

  • June 8, 2017 at 5:45 pm
    Permalink

    Everything is very open with a clear clarification of
    the issues. It was definitely informative. Your website is extremely helpful.
    Thanks for sharing!

  • June 8, 2017 at 5:46 pm
    Permalink

    Hi there to every one, the contents present at this website are truly remarkable for people knowledge,
    well, keep up the good work fellows.

  • June 8, 2017 at 6:41 pm
    Permalink

    Hello would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a difficult time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most
    blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  • June 8, 2017 at 7:19 pm
    Permalink

    Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords
    but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share.
    Cheers!

  • June 8, 2017 at 7:27 pm
    Permalink

    Hello! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest
    authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My website discusses a lot of the same subjects
    as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other.

    If you are interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail.
    I look forward to hearing from you! Great blog by the way!

  • June 12, 2017 at 12:37 am
    Permalink

    This text is invaluable. Where can I find out more?

  • June 14, 2017 at 10:57 am
    Permalink

    After looking into a number of the blog posts on your web site, I really appreciate your technique of blogging.
    I book-marked it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site as
    well and tell me how you feel.

  • June 14, 2017 at 10:55 pm
    Permalink

    It is appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I have read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions.
    Perhaps you could write next articles referring to
    this article. I want to read even more things about it!

  • June 19, 2017 at 9:55 am
    Permalink

    Asking questions are really good thing if you are not understanding something completely, however this piece of writing offers pleasant understanding yet.

  • June 23, 2017 at 12:51 am
    Permalink

    Hello mates, how is everything, and what you want to say on the topic
    of this post, in my view its in fact amazing in favor of me.

  • June 23, 2017 at 1:57 pm
    Permalink

    I just want to tell you that I am just very new to blogs and actually savored you’re page. Likely I’m going to bookmark your blog post . You surely have superb posts. Thanks a lot for sharing your website page.

  • June 23, 2017 at 11:47 pm
    Permalink

    Everything is very open with a precise description of the issues.
    It was definitely informative. Your site is very helpful.
    Thank you for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.