Watchdog Needed

After decades of indecision, the Indian political leadership has come to favour realism over idealism in answering the ethical question: Should India weaponise at all? Some have subsequently assumed that this initial decision accounts for all eventualities thus failing to recognise that a decision to weaponise is textured by a variety of continuing choices. It depends on the type of weaponisation India chooses to undertake and what this entails.

For example, the draft report of the National Security Advisory Board (NSAB) — as a template of intention — projects a maximalist Indian deterrent. Of course it could be argued that the NSAB is a sounding board rather the architect of India’s nuclear project in which case we, in fact, do not know what the government of India’s intentions truly are. Kanti Bajpai has noted that the NSAB has produced …a cross between a deterrence textbook and a wish-list of what an ideal deterrent capability should be rather than a realistic framework of what India can afford”. Then, can one assume that the government will actually consider the draft report seriously? The implications of the discrepancy between intentions and present capabilities are two-fold: first, India will have to undertake massive programmes of investment to create orthodox deterrent capability; and second, the choice of programmes and the costs they entail will bear considerably on the economic and human security that underlies a more comprehensive measure of national security.

Will the government abide by the draft report? If it does not, then the NSAB has produced a set of guidelines that are essentially unrealistic: this is a bad start for a critical institution. Maybe the NSAB has actually produced useful guidelines but these have not been disclosed — if so, then why release the draft report at all? Ultimately then we have a wide margin to consider: the government is going to do something that lies between nothing and everything that deterrence requires.

Why should this confusion be a source of concern for us? Principally, in an era of fiscal deficit, we must be promised that reductions in food subsidies are not a consequence of wasted expenditure elsewhere. Moreover who prioritises guns over butter? Opinion polls suggest that people consider education, poverty reduction and population control to be more important. Will it be empty stomachs and nuclear umbrellas? If it is somewhere in between — then who decides and how? Most importantly — how do the people get a chance to influence the outcome? Failing this, Amitabh Mattoo will be proved correct in describing the nuclear decision-making process as scientific and political czarism”.

Secrecy marks the limit of public information, accountability and knowledge and as such is a boundary-producing mechanism. Essentially the principles of democracy require that what should be done is what is decided by the sovereign people. In practice, however, nuclear decisions can hide from democracy under the veil of national security and a leap of faith instead requires for elected and responsible officials to act in the best interests of the people, inadvertently creating a principal-agent problem. A principal-agent problem is one where the absence of perfectly available information — in this case due to secrecy — results in the agent having an informational advantage over the principal who has delegated work to him.

Solutions to this problem require information revelation mechanisms that allow for accountability to be exercised. Preventing this is the fundamental structural disadvantage that hampers civil society: elites as privileged groups have the ability to manipulate the political agenda through the institutions of the state while dispersing costs over the latent polity. This is an organisational dilemma: rational citizens are unlikely to be willing to bear the costs of searching for the information required to hold governments accountable because we know that others will be able to free ride on our efforts. Meanwhile the substantially fewer immediate beneficiaries will have an easier time, forming a coalition of vested interests on a you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” basis.

Adding to this there remains the concern that the desire to ensure accountability is weakening. Civil society requires an optimum mix of parochial and civic values that allow for a virtuous civic capacity sufficient to keep the government on its toes. However, parochial caste/regional/religious interests result in the division of civil society into groups that increasingly focus upon holding their own representatives accountable for the provision of narrower benefit: I will demand that my MP campaign for the provision of this or that reservation or subsidy that affects me directly rather than seek to influence national issues that benefit everybody. The problem is that public interest is a public good: Everybody benefits from my effort while I bear all the costs. Consequently, in a manner reminiscent of the Prisoners’ Dilemma game — all except altruists, will defect and not seek accountability, thus leaving us collectively worse-off. The politics of patronage privatises interests and this is likely to severely undermine the building of coalitions in civil society on issues of secular public interest.

This article seeks to highlight two concerns: our lack of clear information about the weaponisation process on the one hand and the structural issues that complicate our attempts at enforcing accountability on the other. Dealing with this is important because insofar as political power and influence continues to be shaped by the military might of states, nuclear weapons as an emblem of force shall not disappear. As Lawrence Freedman states, Force becomes useless only when everyone agrees it is”. The hypocrisy of the established nuclear powers over de-weaponisation shows that there are substantial benefits from weaponisation, and this will continue to provide Indian planners with added impetus. Nevertheless in an attempt to clarify that India should weaponise only when this protects the interests of the polity, rather than an interest group, we must continue to question the claim that any or every unspecified form of weaponisation will enhance India’s security. Probity then becomes essential, as motives cannot be readily inferred from decisions because several motives can be served by the same decision. Meanwhile, we must remain vigilant against enemies both within and without.

(The author is this year’s Oxford topper. This article is based on his undergraduate thesis Abandoning Ahimsa: Should India Weaponise Its Nuclear Technology that won the Gibbs Prize for Best Thesis of the Year.)

16 thoughts on “Watchdog Needed

  • April 29, 2017 at 4:19 pm

    Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am encountering issues with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot join it. Is there anybody else having similar RSS issues? Anyone who knows the answer can you kindly respond? Thanks!!

  • May 4, 2017 at 1:46 am

    Good day! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this page to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  • May 5, 2017 at 5:30 am

    Now I am going to do my breakfast, afterward having my breakfast coming over again to read additional news.

  • May 5, 2017 at 12:26 pm

    Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after going through some of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely happy I stumbled upon it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back frequently!

  • May 6, 2017 at 4:27 am

    Having read this I believed it was very informative. I appreciate you taking the time and energy to put this information together. I once again find myself personally spending a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  • May 6, 2017 at 7:38 am

    I was recommended this website by my cousin. I’m no longer sure whether this post is written by him as no one else recognize such detailed approximately my problem. You’re amazing! Thank you!

  • May 16, 2017 at 12:13 pm

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will certainly return.

  • May 16, 2017 at 5:57 pm

    I’m amazed, I have to admit. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that too few folks are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy I came across this during my hunt for something concerning this.

  • May 18, 2017 at 10:14 am

    Nice blog here! Additionally your web site rather a lot up very fast! What host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate hyperlink in your host? I desire my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  • May 18, 2017 at 7:50 pm

    Just desire to say your article is as surprising. The clarity in your submit is simply nice and i could assume you are knowledgeable on this subject. Well with your permission let me to clutch your RSS feed to keep up to date with imminent post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please keep up the enjoyable work.

  • May 19, 2017 at 7:32 am

    If some one wishes to be updated with most recent technologies after that he must be pay a quick visit this website and be up to date daily.

  • May 19, 2017 at 8:06 am

    I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re incredible! Thanks!

  • May 20, 2017 at 3:33 pm

    I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one today..

  • May 20, 2017 at 4:10 pm

    What’s up everyone, it’s my first go to see at this website, and piece of writing is really fruitful for me, keep up posting these content.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.